Should Toronto use size limits to rein in ‘monster homes’? Seattle does — with a catch

  • 📰 TorontoStar
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 55%

Property Property Headlines News

Property Property Latest News,Property Property Headlines

Seattle limits most houses to 2,500 square feet — unless there’s a secondary suite. As Toronto mulls allowing backyard homes, could a similar policy help build rentals?

Ever see a neat project in another city and wonder: could we do it here? Should we? We have too, and as part of an ongoing series we’ll be taking ideas from around the world and running them through the lens of Toronto.

Secondary suites had been allowed across the city for years, but had what senior planner Nick Welch described as “anemic” uptake. It was an incentive meant to get more housing units built. “It’s things like this that we’re looking at, and that we should be looking at,” Bailão said. “It’s how we nudge people into creating the housing that we need most in the city.”

But both she and Karen Chapple, director of the University of Toronto’s school of cities, hope to see more creative ideas to incentivize development. “It seems like there needs to be more carrots,” Chapple said, while stressing that public education was also part of the equation.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

mud huts ... prevent global warming Liberal MPs ... they get castles

Seattle is a dumpster fire of a city, ever since the leftists took over. Of course the Star would want the same for Toronto.

Yeah, let's be Seattle.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 60. in PROPERTY

Property Property Latest News, Property Property Headlines