Will home buyers be better off paying stamp duty or property tax?

  • 📰 theage
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 77%

Property Property Headlines News

Property Property Latest News,Property Property Headlines

Modelling shows swapping stamp duty for a property tax could be the better option for those who won’t hold onto their home long-term.

Stamp duty is the more affordable option for buyers staying in the one home for decades, but land tax is the cheaper option for those moving more frequently.

New modelling shows that it will take years for buyers to fork out property tax that would be comparable to stamp duty.The changes would reduce upfront costs for buyers but add another bill to the household budget. While the lower annual tax would add up over the years, new Domain modelling shows that switching could leave some better off.

On a $1.5 million property, it could take 18 years to accrue the stamp duty equivalent in property tax if homeowners were to pay a proposed annual tax rate of $400, plus 0.3 per cent of the unimproved land value. The top 20 per cent of NSW residential property would not be eligible for buyers to opt in to property tax and would continue to attract stamp duty, as previously reported by. The 80th percentile for all NSW dwellings was at $1.54 million in the March quarter, according to Domain data.

While stamp duty was paid by the buyer, evidence showed it comes out of the price received by the vendor, Martin said. He was concerned any savings on upfront costs would be added to a buyer’s spending budget, ultimately resulting in more money for the vendors and putting upward pressure on prices.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Did you index the annual property tax rate? This article is fluffy and suits the age agenda of property turnover for Domain

Once people know the details it could be possible to keep ahead of paying full stamp duty for ever. Just keep selling.

And for those who do hold onto their long-term home?

But it’s disastrous for those who do

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 8. in PROPERTY

Property Property Latest News, Property Property Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Will home buyers be better off paying stamp duty or property tax?Swapping stamp duty for a property tax could save some home buyers serious cash, with new modelling showing it could be the better option for those looking to hold their home for the medium to short term. The stamp duty is up front and added to 30 years of mortgage. You end up paying it a couple of times in interest. As a Valuer with 40 years experience & trained by the Valuer General, I can confidently say if people pay land tax based on the current Land Value system there will be winners & losers. Land Values, assessed by contractors for the VG, are totally inequitable.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

Stamp tax debate: Victoria faces a great property tax opportunityWith just over five months until Victorians go to the polls, now is the time for our major parties to leverage the momentum for real tax reform. How about tax reductions? I know... I'm dreaming. A tax forever, year ten you will have paid your stamp duty. Every year after you are gouged Short term gains for long term wains
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »

‘Choose your poison’: First homebuyers face awful dilemma due to recent property market changes - realestate.com.auRecent changes in the housing market have left first-time buyers with two risky choices that one buyer’s agent has compared to “choosing your poison”.
Source: dailytelegraph - 🏆 21. / 51 Read more »