Local councils would get money directly from the federal government as a reward for approving more and higher-density housing under a proposal to help poorer and younger Australians get a foothold in the property market.
The OECD found ownership rates had fallen across every generation for several years, but in every case, people on lower incomes had suffered the most. “A big problem is NIMBYs who don’t want more people living where they live. That stops other people, living in another part of the city, moving to that suburb,” he said.“Just about every complaint about increased densities or more homes has people complaining about increased traffic, congestion, more people in local parks. That can be dealt with.”, could have its mandate changed.
He said much of Australia’s unmet housing demand of recent years had been “hidden” as people lived in bigger households than they wanted.
swrighteconomy Good news for developers
swrighteconomy Developers lobby group's corruption at peak level. Fill the thousands of empty apartments first.
swrighteconomy Build more ugly, poor quality rubbish, over burden young people with debt and destroy the quality of our suburbs….the developers are getting their political lobbying dollars worth again. The councils are just pigs in the trough.
swrighteconomy A million vacant homes on census night suggests we don't have a supply issue. Scrap negative gearing.
swrighteconomy Yeah this won’t be open to corruption. Poor housing standards here we come.
swrighteconomy Why doesnt Australia have a mandated inclusionary zoning policy wherein developers must allocate a percentage of new builds of certain densities to social/ affordable housing ? As occurs in most OECD countries ? DanielAndrewsMP AlboMP
swrighteconomy Didn't someone publish something recently about vacant houses in towns in Australia? Then it is about constructive work to make certain the old houses are maintained. Not endless pour on the poor for that other ugly that may break the building and construction laws.
swrighteconomy So we need to incentivise councils to increase housing density? If they are the problem, why let them have a say? The money that councils waste fighting developments that are reasonable and VCAT approves all ends up increasing the cost of housing. Remove councils from the process
swrighteconomy Centerlink is the best and has so many benefits plus guaranteed federal/state/council benefits. Making fun of our life and hard work thinking we will have good life but its about them always. I will never send my children to university.
swrighteconomy Fk me. So we need more dense housing is that right? Bring in more HK/ Chinese developers to build out a highly congested South Bank, South Yarra and what not, all of which has destroyed property values
swrighteconomy Anything but actually addressing the systemic factors that promote landlord-ship over owner-occupier-ship.
swrighteconomy So that current ratepayers get no say?
swrighteconomy 🐘🛋'Unprecedented growth in house prices': OECD calls for cap on housing tax breaks benefiting the rich
swrighteconomy Only if there was a guarantee on shoddy work and materials
swrighteconomy
Property Property Latest News, Property Property Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »
Source: brisbanetimes - 🏆 13. / 67 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »