But there are also examples of places where Housing First doesn’t appear to have worked. During the past two years, California has spent $14 billion to combat homelessness — most of it on Housing First programs — but the number of people living on the street has
. Growing concerns about homelessness have become a major political issue in a number of liberal big cities in recent years, in some cases prompting local leaders to rely more on police in their response.Housing First advocates say providing people shelter with no preconditions is the only way to permanently solve homelessness, rather than simply relieve the harm it causes.
There are also those who believe in the principle of Housing First, but see a variety of reasons why it may not work everywhere. One of the biggest challenges, they say, is that there simply isn’t enough housing in many major cities, which can make it prohibitively expensive for local governments to buy up enough homes to make Housing First work. Others say housing alone is not the solution and must be paired with ongoing support services once someone has gotten into a home.
“This approach, though pragmatic and compassionate, has one problem: the pipelines from the street to a stable home are clogged, which means that many homeless people bounce around from the streets to shelters and back again — an exhausting and dispiriting process that leads many to simply give up on the system altogether.” — Jay Caspian Kang,“Temporary housing is expensive and, ultimately, a homeless person in a shelter is still a homeless person.
Is there a topic you’d like to see covered in “The 360”? Send your suggestions to the360@yahoonews.com.
Property Property Latest News, Property Property Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: kgun9 - 🏆 584. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCDFW - 🏆 288. / 63 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »