. Her message seemed to be that, under the 11is good law again, whatever the Supreme Court may or may not have done in the 2010s. If that’s true, it would mean that LGBTQ+ families who live within the circuit’s three states have no constitutional rights to speak of.Circuit hasn’t been alone in outrageously ignoring inconvenient Supreme Court precedent protecting fundamental rights.
Many immigrants who wish to buy a house don’t have this status, including the plaintiffs here, three of whom hold visas and one of whom is seeking asylum. Under state law, they are now barred from homeownership. Andwho buys property in Florida must now sign an affidavit attesting that they are not “principals” of China.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more: