The Supreme Court shouldn’t bless a giant cross on public property

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 82 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 36%
  • Publisher: 82%

Property Property Headlines News

Property Property Latest News,Property Property Headlines

At a time when Americans subscribe to a wide variety of religious beliefs — or none at all — it’s vital for government to be religiously neutral, writes the editorial board. (via latimesopinion)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments about whether the 1st Amendment’s ban on the “establishment” of religion by government is violated by a 40-foot cross that sits on public land on a traffic island in Bladensburg, Md., near Washington, D.C.

The answer to that question is an emphatic yes, for the reason offered by a federal appeals court. It held that the so-called Peace Cross, erected in the 1920s as a memorial to the fallen in World War I, sends the message to a “reasonable observer” that the government agency that maintains the cross “either places Christianity above other faiths, views being American and Christian as one [and] the same, or both.

A decision to “grandfather in” the Peace Cross just because it’s been around for a long time would be disappointing. Even worse would be a ruling that used this case to loosen standards for judging all religious displays on public property. That’s essentially what a lawyer for the American Legion asked the court to do, suggesting to the court that such displays are unconstitutional only if they “coerce” onlookers to participate in a religious observance.

In defending the cross, a lawyer for the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission pointed out that there is a long tradition of crosses being used to memorialize war dead. But Justice Elena Kagan noted that, while a cross might seem to Christians the natural way to honor the fallen, “for members of other faiths, that symbol is not a way to memorialize the dead and does not have that meaning.

At a time when Americans subscribe to a wide variety of religious beliefs — or none at all — it’s vital for government to be religiously neutral. This imposing cross may serve as a commemoration of the dead, but it does so as the central symbol of the Christian religion. It shouldn’t be located on public property.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

opinion So your RAG speaks for We The People now? I want one on ALL PUBLIC PROPERTY. My Country is based on the Grace of ALL MIGHTY GOD according to the Forefathers of America. Anyone don't like it is FREE to LEAVE! 😉😊

opinion DC has Judeo Christian monuments including the Ten Commandments because it’s what our country was founded on. Give me a break

opinion America is Christian✝

opinion Spoken by those who have only served themselves

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in PROPERTY

Property Property Latest News, Property Property Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court will look at whether a cross is promotion of religion or war memorialThe Supreme Court, long divided on the role of religion, is set to decide whether a 40-foot Latin cross in Maryland is an unconstitutional official endorsement of Christianity or a historic memorial for local soldiers who died in World War I. How can an agreed upon religious symbol memorialize people who did not believe in or agree with that symbol. It's as insulting as Mormons 'saving' dead people by declaring them Mormons in the afterlife. Magical Thinking is Magical Thinking is MAGICAL THINKING. What's next changing all the crosses in Normandy? Its been there a hundred years and no issues. Get over yourselves. Next war? Don't put religious symbols then. Mt Soledad reboot...
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »