Comment: Throughout the region, neighbourhoods must evolve

  • 📰 timescolonist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 54 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 75%

Property Property Headlines News

Property Property Latest News,Property Property Headlines

It is a strange phenomenon that so many who are secure in their own homes seem to feel it is their prerogative to actively discourage or even refuse any new homes being built for others.

I have been reading with interest in the past few weeks much about development in Greater Victoria.The common themes are complaints about additional traffic and increased density. And yet we continue to develop to our west and north and that development is actually producing far more traffic than if we were to densify in appropriate places within the core.

We are in the midst of a housing crisis and we are also in the midst of a crisis in attracting workers and professionals largely because many cannot afford to live here or they simply can’t find accommodation. As a local business owner I can attest to the truth of this statement. Finding staff is close to impossible now for local businesses and we see the effects of this daily with local establishments reducing their hours or even closing.But I had a hard time in the recent election campaign understanding the owners of single-family homes that thought townhouses or duplexes on their streets were a terrible threat to the character of their neighbourhoods.

I understand the concerns that many existing homeowners or residents may have. I am not a fan of blanket rezonings and I feel it is essential that residents have a say in developments happening close to their homes.But the flip side of that is that existing homeowners and residents must be open to change. Neighbourhoods and communities must evolve, they cannot remain a snapshot in time.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Post comments from professionals not amateurs!!

When you agree with David Screech:

A large scale plan and vision is not in place for GV. Why not replace the old, low standard construction neighborhoods, or run down industrial zones, which there are many, with high density housing, working, shopping areas, and leave alone the beautiful single house neighborhoods

So many of the anti development types are themselves recent imports to BC. For the most part BC would be better off if they had stayed where the were instead of coming here to die.

The commenter should try moving to Oxfordshire in the UK where they are trying out the 15 minute city concept. Agenda2030

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 15. in PROPERTY

Property Property Latest News, Property Property Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Comment: Before we look for housing solutions, check the mathHow come it is always we need more supply via density, missing middle, sprawl and what-have-you, but never a timeline for when the problem is fixed? Isn’t math racist now? Bringing 500,000 into the country, that need housing now, is madness. We are barely able to keep up with the future housing demand from 375,000 babies born each year. Logic is beautiful.
Source: timescolonist - 🏆 15. / 75 Read more »